Hi,
To keep it lyrical:
Change is good when change is due,
change for the sake of change will make tomorrow blue!
I pride myself on having played most armies, I guess the only two armies I
haven't played is Nids and Squats (I've tried Necrons but not Slann). Nids
because the fluff doesn't appeal to me, Squats because I haven't had a
chance yet! (However, I've spent a lot of time developing a strategy for the
Squats, I'll have to borrow Eivinds squats for a game or two to test my
teories)
I cannot for my bare life find one single rule in the original GW armies
that is unfair! Eldar needs their freecards, Chaos needs their powers
represented by their cards, squats need their extra break point, Space
Marines needs to be allowed to use flyers etc. etc.
We have had great difficulties beating chaos here in Norway, but I'm sure it
can be done! However, to change the rules of an army just because I cant
beat it in a game would for me be the ultimate defeate! For instance I'd
rather spend the rest of my life fighting chaos within the boundaries
present today, than to change one single rule!
On the other hand we have had the developement Slann wich where the first
true NetEpic army, and it has been a difficult task indeed. In the beginning
I found the army utterly cheesy and wanted nothing to do with it. When I
realised it was here to stay, I chose to invest in the army myself(If you
can't beat them, join them!?!). Now I'm able to look at Slann both as a
player and an opponent as I am able to do for most of the other armies.
Thus, I find it difficult to find any rules that are utterly unfair!!!
Therefore I feel a great sadness for the future of NetEpic as I see changes
coming about that in my humble opinion will lower the quality of the game.
Just my 2 NOK
Nils
keeper of the past
-----Original Message-----
From: Rune Karlsen [mailto:rune.karlsen6_at_...]
Sent: 14. mai 2002 09:51
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] 5.0 review
Hi,
as with all things, there will always be a difference of opinion. What you
think
works fine, others might see as something that has potential to become so
much
more. Rules that you clutch to your chest and call dogmas, others might
think are
archaic and long overdue for revision. The beauty of discussion on the net,
is that
everybody gets their say, and we will all benefit from that.
I do agree that some things need to change, simply because they are unfair.
This goes
for most armies. But, we also need to be reasonable, and keep an open mind.
Units
arent necessarily good or bad, it all depends on how they're used, and in
combination
with what forces.
Rune
----- Original Message -----
From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:38 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] 5.0 review
> Hi,
>
> I might be out of line, but the following comes to mind when I skim
through
> the mail traffic on the list...
>
> This is my word of caution;
>
> "If it ain't broke, don't try to fix it!"
>
> Nils
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue May 14 2002 - 08:11:20 UTC